Friday, May 31, 2019
The Cuban Identity: truly their own? Essay -- US Foreign Policy
The Cuban Identity truly their own? The join States became involved with Cubas independence struggle with Spain because they had a sagacious interest in extending their power into offshore colonies. Cubas sugar trade was a valuable commodity and served as another interest for the United States intervention in the war against Spain in 1898. Although the war had started three years prior to the United States declaration of war on Spain, they began to exert their influence and power over the settlement by infusing a government structured by appointees of President William McKinley. These authorities created the interim Cuban government as a subset of the United States and the politics and societal structures of which resembled the United States rather than focusing on a Cuban specific structure. They created a government based on democracy which then drew from the sociable structure of Cubans of different color voting for positions within this government. Their structure of the Cuban system was strikingly similar to changes that were being undertaken in Louisiana at the eon and Cuba was a secondary location to exert similar practices. McKinley appointed General John Brooke to be the first military governor in 1899 and Brooke had been known for defend the liberties of black voters in the United States (Scott 155). As Brooke was a foreigner, a few of his policies went under fire from local politicians because he should not have the authority to rewrite rulings about cultural aspects. His debacle with the determination of acquired property possession during the war included a wishy-washy stance that some Cubans felt was a flagellum to the social order (181). This caused concern and unrest amongst the Cubans because it se... ...worth for the United States because the military governments attempted to create another US rather than adopting their strategies for a completely different shade and lifestyle. The political structure was initially st ressed by Brooke and later Wood would develop a class system that did not suit the Cubans culture. These governors were vessels to impart the United States methods for politics and social status and as it became harder to do, the US slowly backed out of supporting the cause for colonization. Although the States were not successful creating either a US or Cuban national structure, their support during wartime allowed the Cubans to eventually enjoy their new freedom from Spain and create their independent culture.Works CitedScott, Rebecca J. Degrees of Freedom Louisiana and Cuba after Slavery. Cambridge, Mass. Belknap of Harvard UP, 2005. Print.
Thursday, May 30, 2019
Voting Requirements in the Economic Arena :: Political Economic Business Essays
Voting Requirements in the Economic ArenaStatus as an bighearted citizen in a political legal power is seen as a sufficient condition to entitle one to a vote for a representative or conk outicipate in collective decision-making. wherefore not apply that same criterion and entitle adult citizens to suffrage rights to decide the composition of corporate boards of directors and decide other corporate matters? If mere adult status and citizenship is sufficient for decision-making in the political arena, wherefore not in the economic arena as well?The easy answer/question is why should anyone who has no stake or interest in a friendship fork out a say in its decision-making? The only people who should have voting rights are stockholders who have ownership rights in the corporation manifested by stock ownership. We generally agree that voting power should be proportional to their stake in the corporation, namely how many shares they own.If votes were not proportionate to ones stake (stock) in the corporation, including none at all, people might easily vote in ways that personally benefit them but harm the best interests of the corporation and other stockholders. For example, imagine if all Detroit citizens were entitled to vote on decisions made by General Motors. bet these voters managed to get on the ballot the question whether the corporation should give all of its profits to local charitable organizations or be plowed back into the corporation as retained earnings. It is not at all inconceivable that donating General Motors profits to local charities might win by a landslide. People who have little or no stake in General Motors can be expected to behave differently than those who do, simply because their decisions are less pricy to them - others bear the cost of their decisions.The identical cost/benefit assessment applies to decision-making in the political arena. Suppose a politician campaigned on the promise to increase disbursal on various social pr ograms that would be funded with higher taxes. People who pay little or no taxes would see themselves as coming out forth by voting for that politician. They would bear little or none of the costs, at least directly in the form of taxes, and they would benefit from the promised social spending increase. As such they could be counted upon to support such a politician. Survey polls showed a less-than-enthusiastic response to President George Bushs calls for tax cuts. Maybe a good part of the reason is the fact that so many Americans pay little or no income taxes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)