Philosophy

Peirce criticizes the trio methods of inquiry that he checks as pre-scientific as unable(p) to fructify feeling per humannessently , only able to accept the person who uses them a transitory degree of certainty . These three methods be : perseverance , chest of drawers and apriorismTenacity is , essentially , the ability to declargon on to a doctrine with sensation s allow for , good turn apart from anything that might make one doubt the picture This is an ludicrous delegacy of fixing belief , and , as anyone asshole see , very easily leads to error - like Peirce himself tell , it comp atomic number 18s to an ostrich who burrows his head in the sand . This may situate belief , save neither does it help survive nor to growing noesis . unless this isn t its only fault : should the tenacious man accidentally commit that others hold opinions , too , and that they vary , he will retrogress certainty in his belief , and frankincense , this method of defence reaction will no longer mould for him - it will not fix his ideas . He must in some way resist the influence of the association , and this method is weak against itAuthority is the temp solution - it is a method that fixes belief by referencing it to somebody who is an authority for the community Better yet , to follow a group which is designated by the community to decide properly - and the others should be kept dull on the subject so that at that place is no diversity of opinion that may neutralize authority . It is very effective for the survival of a community , and Peirce admits that for around commonwealth it is most effective - it fixes individual belief sluice though the real collective belief changes : it goes done its phases so slowly it is unnoticeable in an individual s life history . But this is only as long a s these people need to be intellectual slav! es .

There are that , eternally those who slip through the cracks of such a dust Those who are not important enough to silence but free dare to think - and should they see other cultures (which is inevitable , they will think otherwise and the system will erupt at least in partHowever , the solution proposed by these work force is clam up far from perfect - though some(prenominal) closer to the apotheosis - because it relies on intuitive cin one casepts which are far from experience . The axioms of these systems are taken from intuition solo , and thusly more a subjective matter , a matter of taste , as Peirce puts it . Thus this , too , becomes a fallacy and degenerates into relativism or elaborately built cloud castles . overly subjective opinions and any stylus of social reasoning are too easily influenced , and thus not very inclined to the fixation of beliefs . It is authority once more , as is easily enough shown by the concomitant that any system of learning soon receives an aprioristic method of proof from some branch of philosophical system . The fourth method , that of science , however , is closest to the truth - it derives itself from the logic of nature , one and indivisible unlike the thoughts of custody . It...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay